Times-Call Opinion Piece- Published as "What has the current City Council accomplished?"
Sadly, my local paper, the Times-Call, does not run its opinion pieces on its online version. When they will join the rest of the internet age with the rest of us, I do not know. So, for my friends who aren't local (and thus probably have no idea what I'm talking about here anyway), I'm posting my article here.
Finding another Kaye Fissinger opinion in the Times-Call attempting to justify the increasingly indefensible antics of some of the current city council members shouldn’t have surprised me. I should be accustomed by now to her tireless assaults on LIFT, a local non-partisan pro-business group. Admittedly, I was amused by her vehement insistence that Longmont must not return to the way it was in “the ‘70s, ‘80s or even the past two decades” and must adhere to her (undefined) vision for Longmont’s future. Kaye Fissinger moved here from California less than five years ago. Let that resonate with you for a moment.
I had to ask myself, what is her agenda? What is her motivation for writing such scurrilous, false and misleading things about LIFT? The answer: It’s a diversion, my friends.
Nothing more than an attempt to sway your attention away from the real, relevant, and increasingly costly failures of the city council. If she can convince you that, somehow, LIFT is the bad guy maybe you won’t notice what has been going on over at city chambers. She tries to convince you that the council has made some real accomplishments, but let’s face it, the list is short and has much to do with chickens. The “business-boosting” she writes of is actually a green-energy incentive program used primarily by the city itself for those solar panels over at the pool. It is NOT a job creation, business-growth program. What else has the council done for business? Encouraged us to buy in Longmont. Gee, thanks. That’d be easier if you hadn’t stood in the way of the mall redevelopment.
She attempts to mislead you that LIFT has some sort of nefarious, secret plans only to draw attention away from the actual “daylight” problem the current city council has. LIFT is no secret club; it has no members, no set meetings, no secret handshakes. The council, on the other hand, has certainly proven itself as closed. Lots of private executive sessions and unshared emails.
She decries Mr. Samson for not embracing the new city office of economic development because it competes with the LAEC. I think we all know that a government office “competes” with the private-sector in much the way an alligator “competes” with a duck. It devours it. She shames LIFT for not approving of the city council diverting money away from LAVA, which YOU voted to fund.
She piously accuses LIFT of secretive actions and tells you to be alarmed by “resistance to responsibility and accountability”. She may as well be talking of your council, who have ceaselessly pursued their own agendas a the detriment of the city budget.
Vision for the future? Let’s really talk about that. Are we going to allow our council to continue this ill-charted course in fighting a losing court battle? Your council has already decided they will appeal. Without your input or consent. In a CLOSED meeting. Talk about a lack of daylight! Do you want to owe more money to this lost cause? The judge found that this council’s actions “exceeded its jurisdiction” and it “abused its discretion”. Are we going to continue to allow city money to be wasted grinding axes against churches and “big business”? (News flash: 4C is not “big” business. We’re not talking GE or WalMart here, folks) When do we say enough is enough? The council is asking our city workers to volunteer for furlough, and yet apparently feels it has no end to resources when it comes to throwing money around for court costs. Is this what you voted for? Or were you, like me, asleep at the wheel?
Miss Fissinger seems to truly dislike the town she has adopted. She insists that it much change, now, to her liking. I’m still wondering what her vision for the future is, but if it is anything like the recent council “accomplishments”, she’s right. I don’t like it. Unlike Miss Fissinger, I think I can sum up what the council has done recently pretty simply and without subterfuge.
Stalled a mall redevelopment until the developer could no longer financially pursue redevelopment, thereby forgoing that tax revenue. Funneled tax-payer money to a redundant incubator. Took funding you voted for LAVA for its own purposes. Studied some traffic. Ran a large development into the waiting arms of a neighboring town, thereby forgoing that tax revenue. Scuttled a city attorney who wisely advised them not to pursue a losing court battle with that neighboring town. Lost said court battle. Was found liable for those court costs to the tune of over one-hundred thousand dollars (with certainly more to come). Saved some prairie dogs at the airport. Allowed the good citizens of Longmont to get back to their agrarian roots by housing chickens, both legal and illegal. Installed some solar panels at the local pools.
Yep. That sums it up. Thanks for all the visionary leadership toward the future, council. Considering the fine mess this council has gotten us into, “the 70’s, 80’s and even the past two decades” don’t look so bad! So maybe the question you really need to ask yourself is, do you share Kaye’s future vision?
Recent Comments